|
A weekly e-journal
edited by Arthur B. Epstein, OD, FAAO
|
| Volume
5, Number 19 |
Monday,
May 16, 2005 |
|
|

Click
here for the current issue of Review
of Optometry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Off
the Cuff: The Sanctity of Independent Peer-Reviewed
Journals
 |
What now seems like
a lifetime ago, my good friend Milton Hom and
I stood in the lobby of the Palace Hotel in
San Francisco talking about what our futures
held. Milton wanted to be an author of textbooks
and write refereed papers, and I wanted to lecture
and write in popular magazines like Review
of Optometry and Optometric Management.
Looking back, we both got what we wanted--perhaps
even more than we dreamed possible.
As the creator and founding editor of Optometric
Physician and a contributing editor to Review
of Optometry and Review of Cornea &
Contact Lenses, I understand the power and
importance of the popular press as well as the
future promise of electronic media. However,
I also recognize that textbooks and refereed
scientific journals are the lifeblood of our
profession.
Independent peer-reviewed journals provide a
forum where essential scientific and clinical
information can be presented without undue corporate
or political influence. Why is this important?
Consider the recent experience of a colleague
who headed a small team of investigators. Although
their product comparison study was well done
and scientifically valid, several trade publications
declined publishing it because they understandably
did not want to offend advertisers. Without
independent peer-reviewed publications, their
paper would likely never see the light of day.
And that, dear colleagues, would be a sin.

Case
in Point: Not Your Everyday Migraine
 |
|
A
25-year-old Hispanic woman presented for comprehensive
examination, complaining of previous episodes
of blurry vision, wavy lights and dizziness while
driving. She also reported numbness and tingling
of her right arm and leg during both episodes.
Her medical history was reportedly unremarkable.
Upon examination, best-corrected visual acuity
was 20/20 OD and OS. Pupils, motilities, confrontation
fields and color vision were all normal. Intraocular
pressure measured 14 mmHg OU, and the ocular fundi
were unremarkable except for a choroidal nevus
OS (see photos).
Testing of cranial nerves I to XII revealed no
abnormalities, and automated perimetry demonstrated
no neurologic scotomas. The patient was advised
to limit driving until consultation with a neurologist
could be obtained, but two days later she experienced
another, more severe episode. She was promptly
referred to the hospital ER. Computerized tomography
was performed and found to be unremarkable. The
attending physician concluded that the episodes
were due to migraine brought on by stress.
This patients condition, referred to as
ocular or visual migraine, is quite common. Symptoms
may include blurred vision (usually more to one
side), scintillating scotomas, and/or photopsias,
which persist for 10 to 30 minutes before dissipating.
Typically, however, ocular migraine is associated
with a headache, which ensues shortly after the
aura and may persist for hours. Other associated
symptoms may include nausea, vomiting, lightheadedness
and motor disturbances (e.g., hemiparesis and
aphasia). The etiology of migraine is unclear,
though many believe it is caused by spasm and
dilatation of small blood vessels within the brain.
Ocular migraine can be induced by stress, fatigue,
hormonal changes, or certain foods and medications.
These visual episodes occur more commonly in women
and more often during adolescence and menopause.
Migraine, however, remains a diagnosis of exclusion.
Other etiologies must be ruled out using appropriate
radiologic and/or laboratory tests. Patients diagnosed
with migraine should be educated on nonpharmacological
treatments, including regular rest, exercise and
avoiding potential trigger factors.
--Case
study courtesy of Zoeanne Schinas, OD, Primary
Care & Contact Lens resident, Nova Southeastern
University College of Optometry, Fort Lauderdale,
FL.

Menstrual
Cycle--Dependent Changes in Visual Field of
Diabetic Women
Left eyes of 129
regularly menstruating diabetic women and 48
healthy controls were evaluated to determine
the effect of menstrual cycle on white-on-white
perimetry (WWP) of diabetic women. All subjects
underwent complete ocular examination and WWP
tests both in the follicular (seventh to 10th
day of the cycle) and luteal phases (days three
to seven before bleeding) of two consecutive
menstrual cycles. WWP was performed using Humphrey
Field Analyzer II with SITA Standard, central
30-2 program. Mean sensitivity (MS) of points
located at central 3, 9, 15, 21 and 27 degrees
retinal locations (4, 12, 18, 24 and 16 points,
respectively) were evaluated in all menstrual
phases.
The mean age of the patients with mild and severe
NPDR and control subjects were 28.8, 30.1 and
29.4 years, respectively. Their mean MS values
were 30.7, 30.4 and 30.8 dB, respectively. Diabetic
patients with severe NPDR demonstrated significant
decreases in mean MS values of peripheral 21
and 27 degrees visual field locations during
the luteal phase. However, changes within the
central 15 degrees were not significant. Diabetic
patients with mild NPDR and control subjects
demonstrated no changes in mean MS values of
any visual field locations.
Peripheral, rather than central, visual fields
of diabetic women with severe NPDR demonstrated
a significant retinal sensitivity loss during
the luteal phase. These findings should be taken
into consideration during the clinical follow-up
of diabetic women at risk for glaucoma and ocular
hypertension.
SOURCE: Akar ME, Apaydin
KC, Taskin O, et al. Menstrual cycle-dependent
changes in white-on-white visual field analysis
of diabetic women. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2005;60(2):92-7.
Asymmetric
Pigmentary Glaucoma in Marfan's Syndrome
A
34-year-old man with Marfan's syndrome developed
pigment dispersion bilaterally. In the right
eye, elevated intraocular pressure was associated
with marked glaucomatous excavation of the right
disc and corresponding visual field loss. A
localized zonular dehiscence was present at
the 6 o'clock position in the right eye. Ultrasound
biomicroscopy showed marked iris concavity in
the right eye, increased iridolenticular contact
and superior subluxation of the right lens,
resulting in increased dispersion of pigment
unilaterally.
Asymmetric progression of pigmentary glaucoma
is uncommon and should prompt a search for some
other mechanical factor. The association between
the two syndromes in this patient was most likely
mechanical due to reduced fibrillin expression
throughout the eye and particularly in the iris
and the lens zonules, resulting in loss of iris
tensile strength and marked iris concavity as
well as zonular weakness and partial lens subluxation.
No relationship between Marfan's syndrome and
pigmentary glaucoma has previously been described
in the ophthalmic literature.
SOURCE: Doyle A, Hamard
P, Puech M, Lachkar Y. Asymmetric pigmentary
glaucoma in a patient with Marfan's syndrome.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;[Epub
ahead of print].
Deep
Lamellar Keratoplasty vs. Penetrating Keratoplasty
for Keratoconus
Results
of 20 consecutive penetrating keratoplasties
(PKs) for keratoconus were compared with 20
consecutive deep lamellar keratoplasties (DLKs)
for keratoconus. The PKs were performed between
June 2000 and July 2001, the DLKs between October
2001 and October 2002. All surgery was performed
by one surgeon. Best-corrected visual acuities
(BCVA), refraction and complications were recorded
at the time of surgery, six and 12 months postoperatively.
All PKs were uncomplicated. Two of the DLK group
had microperforations of Descemet's membrane.
There was no significant difference between
the PK and DLK groups in the proportion of patients
achieving 20/30 or better acuity (85 percent
vs. 78 percent). PK patients were, however,
more likely than the DLKs to achieve 20/20 at
one year; 70 percent (14/20) of PKs compared
to 22 percent of (4/18) DLKs. Astigmatism was
significantly higher in the PKs compared to
the DLKs. There were two cases of graft rejection
in the PK group and none in the DLKs.
This study confirms good results from both PK
and DLK for keratoconus with similarly high
percentages reaching 20/30 BCVA. DLK appears
to cause less astigmatism and also has the advantage
of no endothelial graft rejection. The apparent
cost, however, is a reduction in the likelihood
of achieving 20/20 BCVA.
SOURCE: Funnell CL, Ball
J, Noble BA. Comparative cohort study of the
outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating
keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye 2005;[Epub
ahead of print].
NEWS
& NOTES
 |
NEW
CDC STUDY: MANY U.S. CHILDREN NOT
RECEIVING PROPER VISION CARE.
According to a recent report from
the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), only about
one in three children in America
have received eyecare services before
their sixth birthday. The "Visual
Impairment and Use of Eye-Care Services
and Protective Eyewear Among Children"
findings, published in the Morbidity
and Mortality Weekly Report,
were the result of a national survey
of more than 12,000 participants.
The study also found that compared
to black or white children, Asian
and Hispanic children in the United
States were less likely to get their
vision checked. Hispanic children
have a higher prevalence of visual
impairment and blindness than white
children (3.6 percent vs. 2.3 percent),
according to the study. The CDC
report also examined the issue of
eye safety in sports. Only 14.6
percent of all children aged six
to 17 consistently wear protective
eye gear during sports activities,
the study shows--and girls are less
likely than boys to wear protection.
Of the nearly 36,000 sports-related
eye injuries treated in U.S. hospital
emergency rooms in 2002, more than
40 percent were to children age
14 and younger, and many were avoidable.
The CDC study is available at www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5417a2.htm.
|
 |
PREVENT
BLINDNESS AMERICA, BAUSCH &
LOMB OFFER NEW ONLINE RESOURCE FOR
UVEITIS INFORMATION. Prevent
Blindness America (PBA) has announced
the launch of a new website for
patients and healthcare professionals
to obtain information and resources
on uveitis. The site, www.preventblindness.org/uveitis,
is funded by an unrestricted educational
grant from Bausch & Lomb. It
includes educational information
for patients on the symptoms and
treatments of uveitis, and offers
recommendations on working with
ones doctor to treat the disease.
The site also provides links to
uveitis management resources, article
abstracts and patient educational
materials for eyecare practitioners.
For more information on uveitis
and other vision-threatening diseases,
go to www.preventblindness.org
or call 800-331-2020.
|
 |
ALLERGAN
LAUNCHES EDUCATIONAL WEBSITE FOR
CHRONIC DRY EYE PATIENTS. Allergan
has launched a new educational website,
www.FocusOnDryEye.com,
dedicated to providing practitioners
and consumers with up-to-date information
about dry eye. The site includes
patient information on the causes,
symptoms and diagnosis of dry eye,
a discussion of treatment options,
a FAQ page, and a list of resources
and links to more information.
|
 |
AKORN
INTRODUCES GENERIC VERSIONS OF CIPROFLOXACIN
AND OFLOXACIN. Akorn, Inc. has
introduced two new products in the
United States: Ciprofloxacin Ophthalmic
Solution USP, 0.3% (ciprofloxacin)
and Ofloxacin Ophthalmic Solution
USP, 0.3% (ofloxacin), after
the patents for both ophthalmic
solution versions of ciprofloxacin
(Ciloxan) and ofloxacin (Ocuflox)
expired. Industry sources expect
the combined market potential for
both of these products at more than
$40 million.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

It’s
only been up and running a
few short weeks. Yet, it’s
already clear that the Check
Yearly. See Clearly.(SM) marketing
campaign is opening consumers’
eyes to the benefits of regular
eye exams. Call the Vision
Council of America at 800-424-8422
today or visit checkyearly.com
for your free promotional
materials. |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
Optometric PhysicianTM
Editorial Board
|
|
Chief Medical Editor
Arthur B. Epstein, OD, FAAO
Art/Production Director
Joe Morris
Circulation Director
Janice Miller
|
Journal Reviews
Shannon Steinhäuser, OD, FAAO
CIP Team
• Alan G. Kabat, OD, FAAO
• Joseph Sowka, OD, FAAO
• Andrew Gurwood, OD, FAAO
Section Editors
• Murray Fingeret, OD, FAAO
• William Jones, OD, FAAO
• Paul Karpecki, OD, FAAO
• Ron Melton, OD, FAAO
• Bruce Onofrey, RPh, OD, FAAO
• John Schachet, OD, FIOS
• Joseph Shovlin, OD, FAAO
• Randall Thomas, OD, MPH, FAAO
|
|
|
|
HOW TO SUBMIT NEWS
E-mail optometricphysician@jobson.com
or FAX your news to: 610.492.1039.
HOW TO ADVERTISE
For information on advertising in this e-mail
newsletter or other creative advertising opportunities
with Optometric Physician, please contact
publisher Rick Bay (rbay@jobson.com)
or sales managers James Henne (jhenne@jobson.com),
Michele Barrett (mbarrett@jobson.com),
or Kimberly McCarthy (kmccarthy@jobson.com).
HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
To change your subscription, reply to this message
and give us your old address and your new address;
type "Change of Address" in the subject
line. If you do not want to receive Optometric
Physician, reply to this message and type
"Unsubscribe: Optometric Physician" in the subject
line. If you enjoy reading Optometric Physician,
please tell a friend or colleague about it.
Anyone can sign up for a free subscription by
e-mailing optometricphysician@jobson.com.
|
|
|
|